🚪 Module 22 — How to Choose What's Right for You | Death Options Course
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Death and Dying Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio - listen and learn (coming soon)
Module 22 — How to Choose What's Right for You
This final lesson does what no single door could: it stands the reader back from the whole hallway and helps them actually choose. Twenty-one options have been laid open, from the most familiar to the most far-flung, and a reader who has walked the whole course may feel less decided rather than more, because the menu turned out to be so much longer than two. That is exactly the moment this lesson is for. It will not teach any option again; each belongs to its own module and stays there. What it offers instead is a way through, a sequence for deciding, a worked example of a real person doing it, the one truth that takes all the pressure off, and the small practical act that makes any choice actually count.
The Order of Operations
The decision feels overwhelming when all twenty-one options are held in the mind at once, as a flat field of equal choices. It becomes manageable the moment it is run as a sequence, one question at a time, in order. Here is the order that works.
First, layer one: what happens to the body. This is the foundational fork, the body-disposition layer from this course's opening map, and it narrows the field immediately, because it is genuinely either-or. The body is buried in some form, or cremated by flame or water, or composted, or donated, or given to the sea, or preserved, or offered in one of the rarer ways. Settling layer one first collapses twenty-one options into a much smaller set, because most of the choosing anxiety comes from comparing options that were never actually competing.
Second, layer two, but only if ashes will exist. If the layer-one choice produces cremated remains, whether from flame cremation, water cremation, or as the return from body donation, then the memorial layer opens, and a second and gentler round of choosing begins: where the ashes rest, and whether any portion becomes something else. If the layer-one choice produces no ashes, a green burial, a sea burial, a donation that does not return remains, then layer two simply does not apply, and the decision is already most of the way made.
Then, running underneath both layers, the five lenses, applied in turn to whatever options remain. These were named in the opening lesson; here they become the working tools that break a tie.
Faith and tradition. For many people this lens is not one input among five but the first and nearly the last word, and it is honored by asking it first among the lenses: what does my faith hold, and does it settle this? If it does, much of the field falls away at once, and that is clarity, not constraint.
Ecology. How much does the footprint of the choice matter to me, and does that pull me toward the gentler doors or leave me unmoved? An honest answer either narrows the field or sets the lens aside.
Place and visitation. Will my family need somewhere to go, a fixed and findable place, or are they people who carry their dead in memory and need no address? This single question sorts the options powerfully, because some deliver a permanent place, some deliver none, and some let a family have both.
What the family will need. Not what would be most impressive or most aligned with my values in the abstract, but what the actual people I am leaving will be able to carry out, afford in effort and travel, and find comfort in. The best choice on paper is the wrong choice if it lands on a family unable to bear it.
Plain resonance. Last, and never least: which of the remaining options simply feels like me? After faith and ecology and place and family have done their narrowing, there is often a final choice among options that all technically work, and here the right tiebreaker is the quiet one, the door that feels like the person, the landscape that was always theirs, the gesture that makes a family say, yes, that is exactly them. Resonance is not a frivolous basis for the decision. It is frequently the truest one.
Run in this order, body first, then ashes if they exist, then the five lenses in turn, the decision stops being a paralyzing field of twenty-one and becomes a short, navigable path. Most people find that by the third or fourth question, the answer has already begun to announce itself.
One Decision, Walked Start to Finish
Watch the sequence work on one fresh life, because seeing it done dissolves most of the difficulty.
Consider a Priya, sixty-eight, weighing all of this for herself. She runs layer one first. Her family's Hindu tradition holds cremation as the proper release of the body, and that lens, faith, applied first, settles the foundational question almost on its own: flame cremation. Twenty-one options have just become one, at the body layer, in a single honest question. The relief of that is real, and it is available to anyone whose faith speaks clearly.
Because cremation produces ashes, layer two now opens for her, and here the choosing turns gentle, no longer either-or but both-and. Priya applies the remaining lenses. Ecology matters to her but is not decisive; her tradition has already chosen her path, and she is at peace with cremation's footprint. Place and visitation, though, matters enormously, and not for her, for her daughter, who Priya knows will need somewhere to go, a person who has visited her own grandmother's memorial every single year and will want that anchor. And resonance points Priya unmistakably toward the sea, specifically the stretch of California coastline where she has walked every important decision of her adult life.
So Priya combines. She decides that the larger portion of her ashes will be scattered off that coastline, the place that was always hers, given the water with her family present. A second portion will be placed in a niche at the temple her daughter attends, so there is a fixed and findable place to visit, the anchor her daughter needs. And a small third portion, her daughter's idea, will become a single piece of memorial glass, a blue-swirled pendant, so that something of her can be worn rather than only visited. One disposition, the cremation her faith asked for, and three memorial choices layered on top, each answering a different lens: resonance to the sea, visitation to the niche, closeness to the glass.
Notice what Priya did, because it is what most people do once they stop expecting a single answer: she combined. The widespread assumption is that choosing means picking one option and one only, and that wanting more than one is indecision. It is the opposite. Combining, one disposition plus one or two or three memorial choices, is the normal, mature shape of this decision, made possible by the dividing of ashes that this course's Spreading Ashes lesson taught, and it lets a single life honor the several places and people and values it actually held. A life is rarely reducible to one location or one gesture. The decision does not have to be either.
There Is No Perfect Exit
And now the truth this whole course has been quietly walking toward, the one that takes all the remaining pressure off, said plainly and by name: there is no perfect exit, and nobody owes the world one.
The very abundance of options this course laid out can curdle, if a reader lets it, into a new and modern anxiety: that with twenty-one doors open, there must be a right one, an optimal one, a most-meaningful or most-ethical or most-impressive choice, and that to pick wrong, or to pick plainly, is to have failed some final exam. Set that down. It is false, and it is the precise opposite of what the menu is for.
Choosing the familiar is not a failure of imagination. A reader who walks this entire course, learns of mushroom caskets and memorial reefs and the rings of Saturn, and still chooses a traditional burial in the family plot beside their parents has not missed the point; they have used the whole menu to arrive, with open eyes, at the thing that was always right for them, and that deliberate landing on tradition is itself a fully considered choice, worthy as any other. The novel options are not a higher tier. They are simply more doors, and the oldest door is as honorable as the newest.
Choosing nothing, and trusting the people who love you to decide when the time comes, is also a legitimate choice. Not everyone wants to plan this, not everyone can bear to think about it, and a person who shrugs and says they truly do not care what happens to their body, that the people left behind should do whatever brings them comfort, has made a real and even generous decision: to hand the choice to the living, who are the ones it will actually serve. That is not negligence. For some people it is the most honest answer they have, and it deserves no lecture.
The menu, in the end, exists to free people, not to grade them. Every option in this course is offered so that anyone who wants to choose, can, with knowledge instead of default, on purpose instead of by accident. But the freedom includes the freedom to choose simply, to choose conventionally, or to choose not to choose at all. There is no leaderboard. There is no exit so perfect it earns a prize, and no exit so plain it earns a demerit. There is only what is right for this person and the people who love them, and whatever that turns out to be, chosen freely, is the right answer. That is the whole of it.
Making the Choice Known
One small, unglamorous act remains, and without it even the most thoughtful decision can simply evaporate: a choice that no one knows about cannot be honored.
This is the quiet tragedy that funeral directors witness constantly, the person who knew exactly what they wanted, told no one, wrote nothing down, and was then buried conventionally by a grieving family who had no idea there was anything to honor, because the wishes died with the person who held them. All the deciding in this lesson comes to nothing if it stays inside one head.
So the deciding has a final step, and it is twofold and takes very little effort.
First, tell the people who will be in the room. Say it out loud to the family members, the spouse, the children, the friend who will be making calls, whoever will actually be standing in that funeral home within forty-eight hours. The conversation can be brief and need not be heavy; "I want to be cremated and scattered at the coast, and there's a portion for the temple" is a single sentence at a dinner table, and it spares the family the worst kind of guessing on the worst kind of day.
Second, put it in writing, alongside the other end-of-life documents where such wishes belong. The full work of getting one's affairs in order, the documents, the directives, the practical machinery of a well-prepared death, is the territory of this series' course on getting things in order, and it is not taught here; but the single relevant point is this: a death-care wish written down where the family will find it, and spoken aloud to the people who matter, is a wish that will actually be carried out.
Everything in this course is in service of a choice; this is the step that lets the choice survive the person who made it.
The Long View
A final word, and it is one of companionship rather than instruction.
A choice made today is not a cage. People change, and so do the circumstances that shaped a decision: a family moves and the chosen coastline is no longer near anyone, a faith deepens or shifts, a new option becomes available that fits better than anything that existed before, a beloved place is lost or a new one becomes home. The right answer at sixty can become the wrong answer at seventy-five, and changing one's mind is not fickleness; it is simply keeping the decision current with the life it belongs to.
So this decision, like the documents that record it, is worth revisiting every few years, not as a morbid ritual but as ordinary maintenance, the same unremarkable upkeep as updating a beneficiary or refreshing a will. A quiet half hour, now and then, to ask whether the choice still fits. For most people, most years, it will, and the revisiting takes a moment. When it no longer fits, the change is easy to make, far easier than the first deciding ever was.
And that is the last thing this course wants to leave a reader holding: not urgency, not dread, but a calm and recurring companionship with a decision that is genuinely theirs. The whole point of walking these twenty-two lessons was never to frighten anyone toward a choice, but to replace a default with a decision, to trade the not-knowing for the knowing, so that what happens at the end is something a person chose, on purpose, in keeping with who they were and whom they loved. That knowing is a quiet kind of freedom, and it is available to anyone willing to spend a little time with the questions. The doors are all open. There is no wrong one. And there is no hurry at all.
Disclaimer: Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses, lessons, skills, and practices are offered for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨 If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments