👻Module 2: Four Ways of Seeing: How Witches Understand the Divine | Deities, Ancestors, and Spirit Allies Course
Updated: Sep 29
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy Witchcraft Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio – listen on the go - (coming soon)
Module 2: Four Ways of Seeing: How Witches Understand the Divine
Ask ten witches what a god actually is and you will get ten answers, sometimes from the same witch on different days of the week. That is not a flaw in the craft; it is one of its oldest features. The tradition has always made room for wildly different understandings of what gods and spirits are, what they’re made of, where they live, whether they exist outside the practitioner at all, and the craft has gone right on functioning across all of them. Two witches can stand at the same altar, light the same candle, speak the same name, and mean entirely different things by the gesture. Both can have real practices. Both are doing the work.
Still, what a witch believes about the nature of the companions is no idle question, because the belief shapes everything downstream of it. Picture a witch who has been quietly reading about Hecate, walking home one evening, when three dogs cross her path together. If she holds Hecate as a literal goddess who walks the crossroads of the otherworld, those dogs may land as a sign, and her breath may catch. If she holds the goddess as a great image living in the human deep, the same dogs may land as her own psyche waving a flag about something that wants attention. The dogs are the same dogs. The meaning is filtered, and the filter is what witches call a framework: the working understanding a practitioner carries about what the divine is. Framework is the word this module teaches you to use, though you’ll also hear practitioners say stance, lens, or theology, all meaning roughly the same thing.
Four broad frameworks shape most of the modern landscape. Naming them clearly does three things for you: it lets you recognize your own stance, which most beginners hold without knowing it has a name; it lets you understand the witch standing next to you at the bonfire, who may mean something entirely different by the same words; and it lets you begin relational work without needing to solve the metaphysics first. The metaphysics, be assured, will not be solved. Three thousand years of theological writing have not settled what gods are, and the question will not be settled by this course on a Tuesday afternoon. The good news is that it doesn’t need to be. The frameworks are starting points, and the practice is the teacher.
By the end of this module you’ll know all four ways of seeing, plus the smaller rooms that open off them; you’ll know exactly how a stance changes what happens at an altar, walked through step by step; you’ll have a tool for practicing honestly before your beliefs have made up their mind; and you’ll leave with your own written “for now” stance in your notebook, found by a method rather than by guessing. Bring the log from your Week of Small Attention; it has one more job to do before this module lets you go.
The First Way: Animism
You met the word animism briefly at the third door in the opening lesson: the understanding that all things carry spirit or life. Here it deserves its full portrait, because as a framework it changes not just how a witch sees gods but how she sees everything.
In the animist view, presence goes all the way down. A rock by the door is not inert, a river running under the bridge is not merely water, and an old oak at the edge of a field is not only timber and bark. The world is not a stage of dead objects with a few important presences carefully laid on top; the whole stage is alive. Even the cup a witch drinks her tea from has a faint, quiet quality of its own, while the mountain visible from her window has a vast, slow one. Most indigenous worldviews across the globe rest on animist foundations, a debt this course will keep naming as it goes, and the oldest layers of European folk practice show the same bones: wells that were tended, trees that were asked before cutting, thresholds that were greeted.
Here is the detail worth knowing about how modern witches actually arrive at this view: mostly not through study. Practitioners describe starting somewhere else entirely and finding, after years of paying attention, that the world simply got more populated. Animism, in the craft, is often less a belief one adopts than a recognition that lands once the practice has been going long enough. For the animist witch, the relational field is enormous. Deities and ancestors are present, yes, and so is the juniper outside the bedroom window, the crow that owns the block, and the land the house sits on. Her practice tends to be local, daily, and woven through ordinary life.
The Second Way: Polytheism
Polytheism means the understanding that there are many gods, real and distinct. In the form practitioners call hard polytheism, the gods are independent beings with their own personalities, preferences, histories, domains, and demands. Hecate is not Brigid, any more than your two closest friends are each other, and Odin and Zeus, whatever the old comparison charts claimed, are two different persons entirely. Treating any of them as interchangeable is treating none of them as themselves.
The polytheist witch therefore approaches a deity the way one approaches a particular person with a particular character. When she prays to the Morrigan, she means the Morrigan. Not the dark feminine principle, not a useful symbol of sovereignty: the Morrigan, who is herself, who has her own ravens and her own demands, and who exists whether or not the witch happens to be thinking about her at the moment. Relationship, in this frame, carries real weight, because there is genuinely someone on the other side of it.
The Softer Variation
Close beside this lives what the community calls soft polytheism, and many witches settle there as a middle ground. The soft polytheist also prays to Brigid and means Brigid, but holds open the possibility that Brigid and the fire-and-craft goddesses of other cultures may be local expressions of something deeper: currents in one wider field rather than wholly separate beings. Notice what she does not do. She does not collapse all goddesses into a single interchangeable Goddess; the distinctions still matter to her, and offerings to Brigid are not offerings to just any fire goddess. What she allows is the possibility that the universe holds fewer fundamental divine principles than it holds names for them, without insisting on the answer.
One honest footnote, because you will meet this in the wild: practitioners argue about these two labels, sometimes heatedly. Some polytheists say only the hard kind is really polytheism at all, and that the soft kind is better filed under other names. You don’t need a position in that argument. You need to know the labels exist, roughly what each gestures at, and that the person using them may draw the lines a little differently than the last person did. Asking “what do you mean by that?” is always respectable craft.
The Third Way: The Archetypal View
The third framework moves the action inward, and it needs one word defined first. An archetype is a deep, recurring pattern of human experience that shows up as an image or figure: the wise elder, the fierce mother, the trickster, the one who descends into darkness and returns changed. The word comes from depth psychology, but the patterns themselves are older than any psychology; they’re what myths are made of.
In the archetypal view, deities are exactly such figures, grown enormous with meaning: images charged by centuries of worship, storytelling, art, and devotion, living in the shared human imagination. Working with them activates real forces inside the practitioner. The fierce sovereignty the Morrigan represents, the disciplined wisdom Athena carries, the transformational descent Persephone walks: in this frame, those forces are entirely real, and engaging their images moves them. Whether the deities also exist as independent beings outside the psyche is a separate question, and the archetypal practitioner is often agnostic on it, meaning she holds the question as honestly unanswerable, or she leans toward doubt. The work still works. The descent into Persephone’s underworld still cracks open whatever needed cracking.
This stance is common among witches with psychological training, secular upbringings, or a temperamental allergy to anything that smells like dogma, and let it be said plainly: it is not a lesser practice. Some of the most disciplined and beautiful ritualists of the last hundred years have worked from exactly this frame.
The Fourth Way: The Non-Theistic Path
The fourth framework declines the question entirely: no gods, and no spirits in any literal sense. Magic, here, is technique: energy, will, attention, the practitioner shaping her life and perhaps her world through focused intention, with ritual understood as a powerful psychological technology rather than a conversation. The current movement often goes by naturalistic paganism or atheopaganism, names worth knowing because this path has grown large enough to have books, communities, and seasonal celebrations of its own. The non-theistic witch may still read myth, honor the turning seasons, cast spells, and walk the wheel of the year with devotion. What she does not do is treat the practice as relational in the sense this course teaches; the altar is hers, the will is hers, the work is hers, and the cosmos is vast but not personal.
This path is named here, in a course on relational practice, to keep the door honest. Non-theistic witchcraft is a complete and valid way to practice, and the witch who finds herself there at the end of long thought has not failed at the craft; she has located herself, which is worth more than performing a stance she doesn’t hold. If that turns out to be you, this course will still give you the map of what your relational sisters are doing and why, and the door back in never locks behind anyone.
The Neighboring Rooms
A few more stances open off the main hallway, and you’ll bump into their names early and often, so here they are in plain sentences.
Duotheism. The understanding that the divine is fundamentally two: a Goddess and a God, with all the world’s many goddesses honored as her faces and the many gods as his. This is the classic theology of much of Wicca, the twentieth century’s most influential witchcraft religion, and it’s where the famous saying that all the goddesses are one Goddess comes from. If you’ve seen altars set with one candle for the Lady and one for the Lord, you’ve seen duotheism.
Pantheism. The understanding that the divine and the universe are one and the same: divinity not as a being within the world but as the livingness of the whole world itself. A pantheist witch may keep no altar to any named god and still consider every walk outdoors a devotional act.
Agnosticism, worn as a stance. Plenty of practitioners simply say “I don’t know what they are, and I’ve stopped needing to.” In this field that is not fence-sitting; it’s a respectable settled position with a long pedigree, and some of the steadiest devotional practitioners you’ll ever meet live there.
How a Stance Changes What Happens at the Altar
Frameworks sound abstract until you watch them work, so let’s put one small scene under each of the four lenses and see what actually changes. The scene: an evening, a single candle, and a witch who has felt drawn toward Brigid lighting it and speaking her name. Then, as happens far more often than the books admit, nothing perceptible follows. Watch what each witch expects, how she speaks, and what she does with the silence.
The animist witch comes to the candle as one presence among many in an already-crowded room. Before Brigid’s name, she may quietly greet the flame itself, the hearth, the house. Her address is neighborly: “Brigid, lady of the forge, you’re welcome at this fire.” The silence afterward doesn’t trouble her much, because in her frame the visit happened regardless; presence was kept, the way sitting with a quiet friend still counts as company.
The polytheist witch comes to the candle as to a door with someone real on the other side. She’s likelier to have learned Brigid’s lore first, the way you’d learn something about a person before knocking, and her address is personal and courteous, the way one speaks to an elder not yet well known: “Brigid, keeper of the flame, I’m [name]. I’ve come to begin an acquaintance.” The silence she reads relationally: perhaps not yet, perhaps not this way, perhaps simply the long patience of a being three thousand years old meeting someone brand new. She’ll come back tomorrow, exactly as she would with a person worth knowing.
The archetypal witch comes to the candle as to a mirror of the deep. She’s chosen Brigid deliberately, because forge and craft and healing name something she’s working on in herself, and her address may sound like invitation rather than conversation: “Flame of Brigid, wake what makes and mends in me.” The silence doesn’t read as absence at all; in her frame the ritual’s work is happening below the waterline, and she looks for its effects over the following days in her energy, her dreams, her willingness to begin things.
The non-theistic witch, if she keeps this scene at all, comes to the candle as to a focusing instrument. The name Brigid, for her, is dense poetry: shorthand for a constellation of qualities she intends to cultivate. Her words might be intention spoken plainly: “By this flame I commit to my craft this season.” Silence isn’t even a category; nothing was being listened for. She measures the work entirely by what changes in her behavior afterward.
Same candle, same name, four different evenings. Two practical teachings hide in this walkthrough, so let’s pull them into the light. First: when you read any book of practice, or any lesson ahead in this course, it will land differently depending on your frame, and now you can notice the landing instead of being confused by it. Second, and more tenderly: what silence means is a function of your framework, and every single frame has an honorable, non-catastrophic reading of a quiet altar. Not one of the four witches above concluded that she failed or was refused. Keep that in your pocket; whichever stance turns out to be yours, its reading of silence comes with it. And whether a moment like the three dogs on the walk home amounts to an actual calling is a question with its own anatomy, which the next lesson takes up in full.
A Tool for the Undecided: Practicing “As If”
Now the worry that stops beginners cold: “I don’t know what I believe yet, so how can I practice anything?” The craft’s working answer is a small tool with a long history, and it’s worth learning by name: practicing as if. You choose a working stance the way a scientist chooses a working hypothesis, and you practice from it sincerely, watching what happens, with the question left respectfully open. For one season a witch might practice as if Brigid is a person who can be courted with courtesy, keeping the lore and the offerings and the greetings, not because she’s certain but because that’s the experiment. Sincerity is what keeps this honest rather than hollow: within the practice you give it your whole heart, and around the practice you keep your grown-up judgment, exactly the way you can be wholly moved by a novel you know is fiction. No pretending to certainty, no waiting for certainty. The doing teaches, and your stance will be built out of what it teaches you.
Most Witches Are Mixtures
Here is the thing the tidy list above conceals: most witches do not hold any framework cleanly, and the longer someone practices, the more mixed she tends to get. Meet Gloria, thirty years into her craft. Ask her what she believes and she’ll pour you tea and take a while. She’s archetypal about the Greek gods, whom she finds beautiful but distant, like paintings in a museum she loves. She’s a flat-footed polytheist about one Celtic goddess, because of a dream twenty years ago that she’ll tell you about only after the second cup. With the juniper outside her bedroom window she’s a pure animist, and about most of everything else she’s cheerfully agnostic. Twenty years ago her answers were different, and twenty years from now they’ll have shifted again.
Gloria is not confused. Gloria is honest. Inconsistency across categories is not a problem in this craft; integrity matters more than doctrinal tidiness, and the witch who genuinely meets each presence as it actually arrives is working more honestly than the one who decided in advance what every encounter must mean. So when the method below hands you a stance, hold it the way Gloria holds hers: in pencil, plural if it wants to be, and revisable by experience. Choosing a starting stance is never choosing forever. It is choosing for now.
Finding Your “For Now” Stance: A Written Method
You could guess at your stance, but guessing tends to produce the stance we think we’re supposed to have. This short written method catches the one you actually hold, by watching your instincts instead of asking your opinions. Take out your notebook, title a page “Where I Stand, For Now,” and give this fifteen unhurried minutes.
Run the three scenarios. For each scenario below, write the very first reading that rises in you, before any editing. One: three dogs cross your path the evening after you’ve been reading about Hecate. Two: you dream, vividly, of a red-haired woman at an anvil, and the dream won’t fade. Three: standing under an enormous old tree, you feel suddenly, distinctly accompanied. Write what each one would mean to you, in one honest sentence apiece.
Read your three sentences against the four ways. Now play field guide with your own handwriting. Writing full of presence-in-things leans animist. If the figure gets treated as someone, that leans polytheist. Readings about your own depths, patterns, and needs lean archetypal, while a reach for coincidence, psychology, or “interesting, but just a dream” leans non-theistic. Remember that every one of these is a respectable place to stand.
Ask the Wednesday-morning question. Set the scenarios aside and ask yourself the plainest version: on an ordinary Wednesday morning, coffee in hand, before the question puts on any robes, what do I actually suspect the gods are? Write the answer in one sentence, however unglamorous. “Honestly, I suspect they’re real” and “honestly, I suspect they’re us, ancient and deep” are both perfect entries.
Write the stance, in pencil. Finish the page with one sentence in this shape: “For now, I’ll practice as if...” and complete it from what steps two and three showed you. Mixtures are welcome; “as if the land is alive and the gods are open questions” is a fine stance. Date it. You’ll be invited to reread it at the end of this course, and someday it may make you smile the way old photographs do.
That dated sentence is your framework, caught in the wild and pinned gently to the page. Every lesson ahead will land somewhere on you, and now you know the shape of the ground it’s landing on.
Witch Practice: The Four Lenses
Your Week of Small Attention left you with seven honest lines in your notebook. This practice takes the richest of them and does what working witches actually do with an experience: turns it in the light.
Choose your moment. Reread last week’s log and choose the single entry with the most life in it, even faint life. If the week was seven kinds of nothing, choose the evening that was most pleasant anyway; the practice works on quiet material too.
Write it through all four lenses. On a fresh page, write four short readings of that one moment: what it means if the world is alive all the way down; what it means if someone real was on the other end; what it means as news from your own deep places; and what it means if it was simply attention, doing what attention does. Give each reading two or three sincere sentences. Argue each one’s best case, like a lawyer who loves all four clients.
Notice which reading has heat. Read the four aloud, alone, and notice with your body rather than your opinions: which one felt truest in the mouth? Which one bored you? Which one scared you a little? Heat, boredom, and fear are all data. Write one line about what you noticed.
Check the finding against your stance page. Set this beside the “for now” sentence you wrote earlier and see whether they agree. If they do, your stance just earned its first corroboration. If they don’t, even better: you’ve caught your instincts and your opinions disagreeing, which is the most useful discovery a beginning relational witch can make. Amend the stance page if it wants amending; it was written in pencil for exactly this reason.
Close with one lens you don’t hold. Last, a stretch that keeps a witch supple: pick the lens furthest from your own and write two sentences of genuine respect for the practitioners who live there, naming one thing their way of seeing does beautifully. You’ll stand at bonfires with all four kinds before your craft is old, and this little habit is how the craft stays kind.
With your map drawn and your stance caught on paper, you’re ready for the question that brings most students to this course in the first place: what is actually happening when a deity seems to arrive in a life, tapping on its windows, and how does a sensible witch tell? Bring your notebook, and bring the three-legged stool. Both work hard in the next lesson.
Disclaimer: Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. The courses in the Witchcraft & Folk Magic Series explore witchcraft, folk magic, and related spiritual and cultural practices for educational and personal-interest purposes only. Nothing in them guarantees any particular result, and no ritual, spell, correspondence, or practice is offered as a substitute for professional medical, psychological, legal, or financial advice. Practices that involve fire, candles, herbs, plants, or other physical materials carry real risks such as burns, allergic reaction, or toxicity, and any practice is undertaken at your own discretion and risk. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨 If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments