🌐 Module 2 — The Life and World of Hierocles | Hierocles Course
Updated: Oct 30
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Philosophers Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio - Listen on the Go: Daniel
🌐Module 2 — The Life and World of Hierocles
For roughly seventeen centuries, the Stoic who drew those famous widening circles of concern was, for all practical purposes, gone. His books had crumbled, fallen out of circulation, or simply stopped being copied, which in antiquity amounted to the same thing as vanishing. Then, in 1901, a damaged scroll of papyrus was unearthed in Egypt, near the ruins of a town called Hermopolis. Papyrus, the paper of the ancient world, is a writing sheet made from the pressed stalks of a Nile river reed, and it survives for thousands of years only where the soil stays bone-dry, which is precisely what Egypt offers. The scroll carried column after column of careful Stoic argument, and the author was Hierocles. A philosophy had been lying in the sand the whole time, waiting.
That recovery is the reason there is anything to teach. It is also the first thing to understand about him: Hierocles reaches us in pieces, and the pieces are remarkable.
A Life We Can Barely See
Almost nothing certain is known about his life, and honesty about that is part of the subject. The fixed points are few.
He was a Stoic who lived in the 2nd century of the common era, in the Roman imperial age, and his subject was ethics. The single firm anchor is a fellow writer. Aulus Gellius, a Roman author of the same century who kept a famous book of learned miscellany, mentions Hierocles among his contemporaries and calls him a grave and holy man. That one line does double work. It fixes roughly when Hierocles lived, since Gellius can be dated, and it preserves how he struck the people around him: as someone serious enough to be worth naming with respect.
Beyond that, the record thins out fast. The following are not facts but the open questions and educated guesses that surround him, and they are worth keeping separate from what is actually known:
Nobody knows his exact dates. Scholars usually place him in the first half of the 2nd century, often in the reign of the emperor Hadrian, which would make him a rough contemporary of the better-known Stoic teacher Epictetus. This is reasonable inference rather than documented fact.
The names of his teachers, students, and school are lost; no reliable account survives of where he lectured or whom he learned from.
One tempting identification stays a guess. An ancient source mentions a Hierocles from Caria, a region of what is now western Turkey, who was a boxer before he turned to philosophy late in life. It is an irresistible image, the fighter who became a teacher of gentleness toward strangers, but no real evidence connects the two men, and careful scholars treat the identification as an unprovable hypothesis, not biography.
This is the right posture for the whole lesson, and it is worth saying plainly because so many books do the opposite. Where the record is silent, the silence gets named, not filled.
Not the Other Hierocles
One confusion has to be cleared early, because it tangles the sources themselves. There are two ancient thinkers named Hierocles, and they are not the same person.
The one this course teaches is the Stoic of the 2nd century. His namesake, Hierocles of Alexandria, was a Neoplatonist, meaning a follower of the later philosophical school built on Plato's ideas, and he lived much later, in the 5th century. That Alexandrian is best known for a commentary on a set of verses attributed to Pythagoras, called the Golden Verses. Separated by some three hundred years, the two men held different philosophies and worked on unrelated problems. Trouble crept in because some of the surviving excerpts of the Stoic Hierocles came down through the manuscripts wrongly filed under his namesake's name. Untangling them was part of the modern detective work of recovering him. A scholar named Karl Praechter argued on the evidence of style and substance that the excerpts belonged to an earlier Stoic, and the papyrus from Hermopolis, published in 1906, confirmed he was right. Anyone who goes looking today will still find the names crossed in older sources, so it pays to know the tangle exists.
The World That Made the Question Real
It matters that Hierocles taught when and where he did. The 2nd-century Roman empire was near its height: a vast, road-laced, multi-ethnic state reaching from Britain to the edge of the Sahara to the Near East, holding Greeks, Syrians, Gauls, North Africans, Egyptians, and dozens of other peoples under one sprawling authority. Citizenship was widening. Trade, armies, and administration mixed populations on a scale the older Greek city-states had never seen.
That world was itself a standing argument that strangers of every origin might belong to a single community. A Stoic asking how far a person's concern ought to reach was not posing an abstract puzzle. He was looking at an empire in which the question came up on every road and in every market. The famous claim his philosophy builds toward, that the outermost circle of concern is the whole human race, grew in soil that made it feel less like a dream and more like a plain description of the place he already lived.
The Two Books
What survives of Hierocles comes from two works, very different in character, and worth telling apart clearly.
The Elements of Ethics. The systematic work, written for serious students of the Stoic school, in technical language and careful order. It begins from the ground up, with an argument about how a living creature first perceives itself, the foundation the rest of his ethics is built on. This is the work recovered on the 1901 papyrus. Its actual argument is the subject of the next lesson, not this one.
On Appropriate Acts. Sometimes called On Duties, this was the more literary, public-facing work, written for a general reader rather than the schoolroom. It dealt with the concrete obligations of an ordinary life: how to honor the gods, what is owed to one's country, proper conduct within marriage, care of parents and kin, and the running of a household. Its contents are taught later in this course.
A Thinker Reconstructed From Accident
Put the survival of the two works side by side and something striking appears. Hierocles is a philosopher we possess almost entirely by luck.
The Elements survived because a single scroll happened to be buried in Egyptian ground dry enough to preserve papyrus across seventeen centuries, until chance and excavation brought it back to light. On Appropriate Acts was saved by a completely different accident. A 5th-century compiler named Stobaeus, assembling a huge anthology, meaning a collection of choice passages gathered from many authors into one set of volumes, apparently as an education for his son, copied out long extracts of Hierocles before the original was lost. Anthologies like his are among the great quiet heroes of ancient literature; a surprising amount of classical writing exists today only because some attentive reader excerpted the good parts. Without Stobaeus, the duties would be gone too.
So the man comes down to us through two unrelated strokes of fortune: dry sand and a careful reader's taste. It would be easy to treat a figure recovered that way as a curiosity. That would be a mistake. What the accidents preserved is not scraps but reasoning, enough connected argument to follow his thought from its first premise to its widest conclusion. The record is thin in biography and rich in philosophy, and it is the philosophy this course is after.
Where He Fits in the Story of Stoicism
Stoics sometimes speak of their school simply as the Stoa, named for the painted porch in Athens, the stoa poikile, where the first Stoics gathered to teach. Hierocles wrote in the late, Roman stretch of that school, which by his lifetime had already lasted four centuries. He inherited the work of the founders, Zeno and Chrysippus, and shared the strongly practical, duty-centered interests that had marked the school's middle period, the same tradition of writing on appropriate acts that the earlier philosopher Panaetius had made influential and that Cicero later drew on. In that sense he is a valuable witness to what Stoic ethics had become generations after its birth.
But he was not only a transmitter. Scholars who study the surviving text, among them his modern editor Ilaria Ramelli, suggest he may have been the first Stoic to explicitly join the two halves of a single idea: the process by which a creature comes to claim first itself, and then others, as its own. That process, called oikeiosis, is the engine of his entire philosophy, and welding its self-directed and other-directed sides into one continuous motion may be his real originality. There is an honest scholarly debate here as well, over whether some of his language about human beings as naturally sociable creatures carries a coloring borrowed from Aristotle's tradition rather than the strictly Stoic one. The debate is worth knowing about; it does not need settling to learn from him.
That engine is where the actual teaching begins. The next lesson opens it.
The Skill: The Three Shelves
Before leaving the biography behind, take something from it. This lesson has quietly been modeling a skill the whole way through, and it deserves to be taught outright, because its usefulness extends far beyond dead philosophers. The same method handles famous figures, family stories, and any quote circulating online with a great name attached. Call it the Three Shelves.
The idea is simple. Every claim about a person or a tradition belongs on one of three shelves, and most confusion comes from shelving things wrong.
The Known shelf holds what a datable source actually says. Gellius names Hierocles and calls him grave and holy, and that documented line earns the detail its place here.
On the Inferred shelf sits everything scholars reasonably work out from evidence. Hierocles probably lived in the first half of the 2nd century, because Gellius, who can be dated, calls him a contemporary. That conclusion is solid but not certain.
Everything else lands on the Legend shelf, home to the tales that keep circulating on pure appeal, with nothing underneath to hold them up. The boxer who became a philosopher lives here. Legends are not trash; they often reveal what people wanted a figure to be. Just never pass one off as fact.
Here is how to run the method on any claim you meet:
1. Write the claim as one plain sentence. "Hierocles was a boxer before he was a philosopher." A claim you cannot state in one sentence usually hides several claims; split them and shelve each one separately.
2. Ask where it comes from. Who said it first? How close in time was that person to the events? A contemporary who names the man outranks a writer centuries later, and both outrank an internet page with no source at all.
3. Shelve it. A claim stated plainly by a traceable source goes on Known. One that rests on reasoning from evidence belongs to Inferred. When the trail runs out and only the story remains, Legend is where it lives.
4. Retell it with its shelf showing. This is the step that changes how you talk. A few phrases do the work, and they can serve until your own arrive. Known claims open with "The one firm source we have says..." Inference sounds like "Scholars work this out from..." or "The best guess is..." And a legend gets "There is a story told, though nothing confirms it..."
5. Keep the legends on their shelf without throwing them out. A legend honestly labeled is a pleasure to tell. A legend passed off as history poisons trust in everything else you say.
Practitioners of this little method find it changes more than their history. It is common to discover, once the shelves exist, how much of what a person confidently repeats has been sitting on the wrong one.
Philosopher's Practice: The Fixed Points Page
Every course in this series runs on a Philosopher's Notebook, and this is the moment yours begins. Any notebook will do: a dollar spiral pad, a document on a phone, the back pages of something half used. It will accumulate named pages as the course goes on, each one a working tool, and by the final lesson the collection will have quietly become something larger. For now, it needs only its first page.
Title the page Fixed Points.
Choose one small claim from your own world. Not Hierocles; that work is already done, and the point now is to take the method somewhere it has never been. Pick something light enough to be fun to chase: a quote that circulates online under a famous name, the supposed origin of a saying or a snack, some hometown lore about a street name or a building, or one fact a coworker repeats that nobody has ever checked. The weightier tales can wait for a later page, once the shelves feel like home.
Over the next few days, give it the Three Shelves treatment. Hunt the claim to its source as far as you can reasonably go, sort each finding where it belongs, and then, this is the heart of the exercise, retell the tale in shelf-honest language, the way this lesson handled Hierocles: state fixed points plainly, flag inferences as educated guesses, and enjoy legends as the good lore they are. Write the honest version on the page under the original.
Then close with a few lines of reflection, in your own first person: What did this story look like before I checked the shelves? Which parts survived? Did the honest version feel smaller than the original, or sturdier? Many people are surprised to land on sturdier, the same way Hierocles comes across as more trustworthy, not less, because this lesson admitted how little is known.
Keep the page. Later lessons will add pages beside it, and the famous circles this course keeps promising will be drawn in this same notebook, by your own hand.
Disclaimer:
Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses present the ideas of historical Stoic philosophers for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They describe what these thinkers taught and argued and do not constitute an endorsement of any philosophical position, nor do they constitute religious instruction or professional advice of any kind. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨
If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments