🌐 Module 2 — The Life and World of Hierocles | Hierocles Course
Updated: Sep 5
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Stoicism Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio is read by AI
Module 2 — The Life and World of Hierocles
For roughly seventeen centuries, the Stoic who drew those famous widening circles of concern was, for all practical purposes, gone. His books had crumbled, fallen out of circulation, or simply stopped being copied, which in the ancient world amounted to the same thing as vanishing. Then, in 1901, a damaged papyrus scroll came out of the ground in Egypt, near the ruins of a town called Hermopolis, carrying column after column of careful Stoic argument. The author was Hierocles. A philosophy had been lying in the sand the whole time, waiting.
That recovery is the reason there is anything to teach. It is also the first thing to understand about him: Hierocles reaches us in pieces, and the pieces are remarkable.
A Life We Can Barely See
Almost nothing certain is known about his life, and honesty about that is part of the subject. The fixed points are few.
He was a Stoic, he lived in the 2nd century of the common era, in the Roman imperial age, and he taught ethics. The single firm anchor is a fellow writer. Aulus Gellius, a Roman author of the same century, mentions Hierocles among his contemporaries and calls him a grave and holy man. That one line does double work. It tells us roughly when Hierocles lived, since Gellius can be dated, and it tells us how he struck the people around him: as someone serious enough to be worth naming with respect.
Beyond that, the record thins out fast. The following are not facts but the open questions and educated guesses that surround him, and they are worth keeping separate from what is actually known:
His exact dates are unknown. Scholars usually place him in the first half of the 2nd century, and often in the reign of the emperor Hadrian, but this is reasonable inference rather than documented fact.
His teachers, students, and school are lost. There is no reliable account of where he taught or whom he learned from.
One tempting identification stays a guess. An ancient geographer mentions a Hierocles from Caria who was a boxer before he turned to philosophy late in life. It is an irresistible image, the fighter who became a teacher of gentleness toward strangers, but there is no real evidence the two men are the same, and careful scholars treat it as an unprovable hypothesis, not biography.
This is the right posture for the whole module. Where the record is silent, the silence gets named, not filled.
Not the Other Hierocles
One confusion has to be cleared early, because it tangles the sources themselves. There are two ancient thinkers named Hierocles, and they are not the same person.
The one this course teaches is the Stoic of the 2nd century. The other is Hierocles of Alexandria, a Neoplatonist who lived some three hundred years later, in the 5th century, best known for a commentary on a set of verses attributed to Pythagoras, the Golden Verses. The two had different centuries, different philosophies, and different concerns. The trouble is that some of the surviving excerpts of the Stoic Hierocles came down through the manuscripts wrongly filed under the name of the Alexandrian. Untangling them was part of the modern work of recovering him, and it is why a reader who goes looking will still find the names crossed in older sources.
The World That Made the Question Real
It matters that Hierocles taught when and where he did. The 2nd-century Roman empire was near its height: a vast, road-laced, multi-ethnic state reaching from Britain to the edge of the Sahara to the Near East, holding Greeks, Syrians, Gauls, North Africans, Egyptians, and dozens of other peoples under one sprawling authority. Citizenship was widening. Trade, armies, and administration mixed populations on a scale the older Greek city-states had never seen.
That world was itself a standing argument that strangers of every origin might belong to a single community. A Stoic asking how far a person's concern ought to reach was not posing an abstract puzzle. He was looking at an empire in which the question came up on every road and in every market. The famous claim his philosophy builds toward, that the outermost circle of concern is the whole human race, grew in soil that made it feel less like a dream and more like a plain description of the place he already lived.
The Two Books
What survives of Hierocles comes from two works, very different in character, and worth telling apart clearly.
The Elements of Ethics. The systematic work, written for serious students of the Stoic school, in technical language and careful order. It begins from the ground up, with an argument about how a living creature first perceives itself, the foundation the rest of his ethics is built on. This is the work recovered on the 1901 papyrus. Its actual argument is the subject of the next lesson, not this one.
On Appropriate Acts. Sometimes called On Duties, this was the more literary, public-facing work, written for a general reader rather than the schoolroom. It dealt with the concrete obligations of an ordinary life: duties toward the gods, toward one's country, toward a spouse, toward parents and kin, and the running of a household. Its contents are taught later in this course, in the lesson on the duties that fit a life.
A Thinker Reconstructed From Accident
Put the survival of the two works side by side and something striking appears. Hierocles is a philosopher we possess almost entirely by luck.
The Elements survived because a single scroll happened to be buried in Egyptian ground dry enough to preserve papyrus across seventeen centuries, until chance and excavation brought it back to light. On Appropriate Acts survived by a completely different accident. A 5th-century compiler named Stobaeus, assembling a huge anthology of worthwhile passages from earlier Greek writers, apparently as an education for his son, copied out long extracts of Hierocles before the original was lost. Without that anthology, the duties would be gone too.
So the man comes down to us through two unrelated strokes of fortune: dry sand and a careful reader's taste. It would be easy to treat a figure recovered that way as a curiosity. That would be a mistake. What the accidents preserved is not scraps but reasoning, enough connected argument to follow his thought from its first premise to its widest conclusion. The record is thin in biography and rich in philosophy, and it is the philosophy this course is after.
Where He Fits in the Stoa
Hierocles wrote in the late, Roman stretch of a school that had already lasted four centuries. He inherited the work of the founders, Zeno and Chrysippus, and shared the strongly practical, duty-centered interests that had marked the school's middle period, the same tradition of writing on appropriate acts that the earlier philosopher Panaetius had made influential and that Cicero later drew on. In that sense he is a valuable witness to what Stoic ethics had become generations after its birth.
But he was not only a transmitter. Scholars who study the surviving text, among them his modern editor Ilaria Ramelli, suggest he may have been the first Stoic to explicitly join the two halves of a single idea: the process by which a creature comes to claim first itself, and then others, as its own.
That process, oikeiosis, is the engine of his entire philosophy, and welding its self-directed and other-directed sides into one continuous motion may be his real originality. There is an honest scholarly debate here as well, over whether some of his language about human beings as naturally sociable creatures carries a coloring borrowed from Aristotle's tradition rather than the strictly Stoic one. The debate is worth knowing about; it does not need settling to learn from him.
That engine, oikeiosis, is where the actual teaching begins. The next lesson opens it.
Disclaimer:
Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses present the ideas of historical Stoic philosophers for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They describe what these thinkers taught and argued and do not constitute an endorsement of any philosophical position, nor do they constitute religious instruction or professional advice of any kind. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨
If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments