🌐 Module 5 — On Appropriate Acts | Hierocles Course
Updated: Sep 6
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Stoicism Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio is read by AI
Module 5 — On Appropriate Acts
There is a particular weight to the people a person did not choose. The aging parent who now needs more than is convenient, and at the wrong time. The marriage that asks for steadiness on a week when steadiness is in short supply. The relative who will be at the gathering, the one it would be easier to avoid. Friends can be chosen and let go. These bonds arrive with the life, fixed in place, making claims. The hardest question in ethics is often not the grand one about humanity in general. It is the close one: what does a person actually owe the people fate has set around him.
This is the question Hierocles takes up in his second surviving work, and it is where his philosophy comes down out of the diagram and into the kitchen, the sickroom, the family table.
What Appropriate Acts Are
The work is called On Appropriate Acts, and the word doing the heavy lifting is a Stoic technical term: kathekonta. A kathēkon is an appropriate act, a fitting act, the thing it makes sense for a person to do given who they are and where they stand. The early Stoics, going back to the founder Zeno, coined the term to name the actions that suit a creature's nature and situation, the acts a person could give a reasonable account of if asked why they did them. Translators sometimes render it as duty, but fitting act is closer to the spirit.
The previous lesson drew the circles of concern in the abstract. This work asks the practical follow-up: given exactly where people stand around a person, in which ring, at which distance, what is the fitting thing to do about each of them. Appropriate acts are the circles converted into conduct.
One confusion is worth dissolving immediately. Kathekonta are not a rulebook, not a list of commandments to be carried out the same way in every case. A fitting act is fitting for a relationship, and relationships differ. What is owed a parent is not what is owed a stranger, and what reverence looks like toward the divine is not what loyalty looks like toward a brother. The Stoic question is never simply what the rule is. It is what this particular bond, rightly understood, calls for. Reason reads the relationship and finds the act that fits it.
The Household as the Seedbed
It would be natural to expect a philosophy of universal concern to begin with humanity and treat the family as an afterthought. Hierocles does the opposite, and the reversal is deliberate.
Social concern, he holds, does not begin in the abstract with all people. It begins at home. The oikeiosis at the heart of this course, the appropriation by which a creature comes to treat first itself and then others as its own, has to start its outward journey somewhere concrete, and the place it starts is the household. A spouse, a child, a parent under the same roof: these are the first others a person is given to widen toward. The grand outermost ring, the whole human race, is not reached by skipping the near ones. It is reached by first doing the real, unglamorous work in the rings closest in.
This is why so much of Hierocles' practical writing is about ordinary domestic life. The household is not beneath philosophy. It is where the social side of his entire system either becomes real or stays a slogan.
Marriage as a Shared Life
Hierocles treats marriage as the foundation of the household, and therefore as a serious philosophical matter rather than a private arrangement of convenience. The fitting form of marriage, he argues, is a genuine partnership: a shared life in which two people run a common enterprise together instead of living parallel lives under one roof.
His most memorable image is of the spouse as an ally. Nature, he suggests, did not send each person into the world alone, but provided, in a sense, a partner, an ally in the long work of living. The picture is striking for how unsentimental it is. Marriage in his telling is less about romance than about a joint undertaking: two people who share the labor, the household, the raising of children, and the daily business of a life, each making the other's load lighter. The household becomes one thing run by two, and that shared enterprise is itself a fitting act, an exercise of the social nature that defines a human being.
The broader Stoic case for marriage, including the argument that it is central to the philosophical life and that women no less than men should study philosophy, is the territory of the Musonius Rufus course and is taught there. What matters here is narrower and structural. In Hierocles' scheme, marriage is the first concrete brick of the wider community, the smallest unit in which a person practices treating another as fully his own.
The Duties That Radiate Outward
From the household, Hierocles' fitting acts spread outward along the same lines the circles trace. Each relationship calls for its own kind of conduct.
To parents and elders. A person owes parents the acts that fit gratitude: care, deference, and support, above all in their age and need. The reasoning is plain. They gave the upbringing that made the person who he is, and the fitting return is to honor that debt in deed and not merely in feeling, by actually tending to them when tending costs something.
To siblings and kindred. Toward brothers, sisters, and the wider family, the fitting acts are those that suit shared blood and a shared past: loyalty, mutual aid, and patience with the friction that close kin inevitably produce. Hierocles treats a sibling almost as a second self, someone whose good is bound up with one's own, and the conduct follows from that nearness.
To one's country. A person stands inside a civic community as well as a family, and that membership has its own fitting acts: contributing to the common life, carrying a fair share of its burdens, and treating the country with something of the regard owed a parent, since it too, in the Stoic view, helped raise and sustain the person.
To the gods. The Stoics held that the fitting posture toward the divine is reverence: piety, gratitude, and a settled respect for the order of things. The full Stoic account of that order, of providence and a rational cosmos, belongs to the Cleanthes course and is taught there. Here it appears only as one more relationship with its own appropriate act, the reverence that fits a creature's place inside a larger whole.
What Belongs to Its Time
Honesty requires a clear note here. This is the role-ethics of a 2nd-century Roman household, and it carries the assumptions of that world. The shape of the family Hierocles describes, the expected roles of husband and wife, the place of children and of social station, reflects Roman arrangements that were hierarchical and gendered in ways most readers today would reject, and reasonably so.
Those assumptions are worth naming plainly rather than smoothing over. They are also worth keeping in their place. The dated frame does not discredit the durable insight built into it, and the insight is this: concern becomes real only when it is practiced on actual people, in the specific shapes their relationships take, and not before. A person can hold the period's social structure at arm's length and still take seriously Hierocles' core claim, that a philosophy of caring for all humanity proves itself, or fails, in how a person treats the few humans actually in the room. The shell is of its time. The thing inside it is not.
Duty as Oikeiosis on an Ordinary Day
It would be easy to read a chapter of duties as a list of obligations, a set of chores handed down by an old philosopher. That reading misses what holds them together.
Every appropriate act Hierocles describes is one thing seen up close: the widening of the circles, made concrete. The care for a parent, the steadiness in a marriage, the patience with a difficult sibling, the share carried for a country, are not separate rules. They are what the engine of his philosophy, the appropriation that begins in the self and reaches outward, actually looks like on an ordinary Tuesday, in an ordinary house, among the ordinary people a person did not choose. The diagram is grand. Its proof is small and daily.
And that daily proof is where the whole of Hierocles' thought finally gathers into a single way of seeing other people, which is what the last lesson of this course takes up.
Disclaimer:
Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses present the ideas of historical Stoic philosophers for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They describe what these thinkers taught and argued and do not constitute an endorsement of any philosophical position, nor do they constitute religious instruction or professional advice of any kind. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨
If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments