Module 4 — Open Questions and Affirmations | Motivational Interviewing Course
- 23 hours ago
- 8 min read
Updated: 2 hours ago
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Therapeutic Modalities Series
Module 4 — Open Questions and Affirmations
The Four Core Skills
The spirit of MI is the foundation, but a stance, however genuine, stays invisible until it takes shape in what a person actually says and does. To carry that stance into a real conversation, MI relies on four core skills, gathered under a small acronym worth knowing from the very start: OARS. The letters stand for open questions, affirmations, reflections, and summaries.
The image is deliberate. Oars are what move a small boat, and used together in a steady rhythm, these four skills move a conversation, not by force but by patient, repeated effort. None of them is hard to understand. The whole art lies in how they are used and in the spirit they carry.
This lesson takes up the first two: the questions that open a conversation, and the affirmations that build a person up. These are the skills that get a conversation going and keep someone willing to stay in it long enough for anything to happen.
Questions That Open, Questions That Close
Most questions fall into one of two kinds, and the difference between them quietly shapes everything that follows.
A closed question invites a short, contained answer, often a single word. "Did you have a good week?" "Are you going to quit?" "Do you think that was a mistake?" Each can be settled with a yes, a no, or a quick fact, and once it is answered it hands the conversation straight back to the asker, who then has to supply the next question. A run of closed questions slowly puts the asker in charge of the entire exchange.
An open question does the reverse. It cannot be satisfied with a single word, because it invites the other person to think out loud. "What has this week been like?" "How are you thinking about quitting these days?" "What did you make of that?" A question shaped this way hands both the talking and the discovering back to the person answering. They have to reach for their own words, and in the reaching they often find things they did not know they thought.
This is why turning closed questions into open ones is one of the most useful small habits in all of MI. "Did the appointment go okay?" becomes "What happened at the appointment?" "Are you worried about your drinking?" becomes "What concerns you, if anything, about your drinking?" On paper the change looks minor. In a real conversation it changes who is doing the work. The closed version asks a person to confirm or deny something the asker already had in mind. The open version asks them to explore something of their own.
It is worth being honest about what makes a question genuinely open, because a closed question can easily wear a disguise. "Don't you think it would be better to stop?" is shaped like a question but is really an opinion with a question mark stuck on the end, and people hear the difference at once. The best open questions come from real curiosity, the kind that does not already know the answer it is hoping for. They tend to be short, unhurried, and free of any hidden nudge toward a particular reply.
There is also something an open question communicates beyond its literal content. It tells the other person that their own view is genuinely wanted, that the asker is interested in what they actually think rather than waiting for a chance to deliver a verdict. Repeated across a conversation, that message does as much work as any single answer. It is also why open questions are not a device for extracting information on the asker's terms. Used well, they are invitations, and an invitation can always be declined. The person stays free to say little, and that very freedom is part of what makes them willing, in the end, to say more.
When Questions Start to Feel Like an Interrogation
There is a trap waiting even for someone asking good open questions, and it has to do with rhythm rather than wording.
Picture a conversation built entirely of questions. One is asked, the person gives a brief answer, another question follows at once, then another. Question, answer, question, answer. However warm the intention behind it, this pattern soon starts to feel like an interrogation. The person answering sinks into a passive role, offering smaller and smaller replies, waiting to see what will be asked next instead of exploring anything for themselves. Something in them closes.
Some of what goes wrong is the unspoken message the rhythm carries. A rapid series of questions tells the other person, without a single word about it, that the asker is steering, that there are right answers being fished for, and that their job is to produce them. Even sincere curiosity, delivered as a barrage, can leave a person feeling processed rather than understood.
The repair is not to stop asking questions but to stop stacking them. A single good question, followed by real attention to the answer and some unhurried space for the person to keep going, accomplishes far more than three questions fired in a row. The aim is a conversation, not a questionnaire, and conversations need to breathe. They leave room between the questions for something to actually unfold.
Affirmation, Not Flattery
Open questions invite a person to speak. Affirmation is a large part of what makes it feel safe and worthwhile for them to keep speaking.
To affirm, in MI, is to notice and name something genuine and good in a person: a strength, an effort, a value they are living by, something they have managed to get right. It grows straight out of the habit of looking for what is real and good in someone rather than scanning only for what is wrong. The skill lies in giving that noticing words.
It is fair to wonder whether this is simply flattery dressed up, and the honest answer is that flattery and affirmation are very nearly opposites. Flattery is praise offered to please, to smooth things over, or to get something, and it tends to float free of anything specific or true. Generic praise carries a similar hollowness. "Good job" and "you're doing great" are pleasant enough, but they are evaluations handed down from above, and they reveal more about the speaker's approval than about the person being spoken to. People can feel when they are being managed by compliments.
Genuine affirmation differs in both its aim and its content. It is not trying to please anyone or steer them anywhere. It simply names something real, and the more specific and grounded it is, the more it lands. There is a wide gap between "you're so strong" and "you kept showing up to those appointments even in the weeks you told me you wanted to give up." The first is a label that can be brushed aside. The second points at an actual thing a person did, and because it is true and particular, it is far harder to dismiss.
Affirmations That Land
Since an affirmation only does its work when it is believed, how it is offered matters as much as whether it is offered at all.
An affirmation lands when it is specific, pointing to something a person actually did or genuinely is rather than to a vague trait. It lands, too, when it is true, observed rather than invented to make someone feel better, because people are quick to sense a kindness that is not quite honest. And it works best when it rests on the person and their effort rather than on the outcome the helper happened to be hoping for. An affirmation that appears only when someone does the desired thing is really just approval in disguise, and it teaches the person that they are valued for compliance. An affirmation aimed at effort and character holds steady whether or not things turned out the way anyone planned.
There is a quieter reason affirmation matters so much. Most people weighing a hard change privately doubt they are capable of it, a doubt usually built from a long memory of times they tried and fell short. They are fluent in their own failures and strangely forgetful of their own strengths. Honest affirmation gently corrects the record. It does not conjure confidence out of nothing. It hands a person back the evidence of their own capability, evidence that was there all along but had slipped out of view. That returned evidence is the first quiet seed of a belief that change might actually be possible, and that belief turns out to matter a great deal.
This is easiest to feel in an ordinary moment. Consider someone who has been trying, and mostly failing, to get up earlier, and who mentions almost dismissively that they managed it twice this week. A flattering response would inflate it: "See, you're doing amazing." An honest affirmation would simply hold the thing up where the person can see it: "Twice, in a week this hard, is not nothing. You found a way to do it even when it was difficult." Nothing has been exaggerated and nothing invented. Someone who happens to be working with a therapist trained in MI will start to notice this same quiet move, the steady naming of small real strengths, and may finally understand why those sessions tend to leave a person feeling more capable rather than more judged.
Both of these skills can be put to use today, in any conversation that matters. One small experiment is to take a single closed question that would ordinarily be asked, something like "Did you have a good day?", and open it instead into "What was today like?", then simply listen to how much more arrives. Another is to notice one true and specific thing a person did well, something real rather than flattering, and to say it plainly, without fuss. Neither move requires a special setting or any expertise. What they require is attention, a willingness to be curious about another person and to take their strengths seriously.
Questions and affirmations can look like small mechanical moves, but underneath they are the same single act: turning toward another person with real curiosity, and taking seriously both what they have to say and what they have already done well. A conversation that begins this way feels different from the inside. The person on the other end, often without knowing quite why, finds it easier to think out loud, easier to be honest, and a little more willing to believe that something might change. None of that comes from clever wording. It is what happens when genuine attention is finally turned toward someone who has grown used to going unnoticed.
Motivational Interviewing Practice: Open the Question, Name the Strength
Set aside 5–10 minutes for this practice. Grab a notebook, a piece of paper, or open a notes app.
Think of one conversation where you might normally ask someone a quick yes-or-no question. It could be about their day, a decision, a habit, a struggle, a goal, or something they have been trying to change.
At the top of the page, write:
A conversation where I could practice asking differently is:
Briefly describe the situation.
Now write one closed question you might normally ask.
For example:
Did you have a good day?
Are you going to talk to them?
Did you do what you planned?
Are you worried about that?
Now rewrite that question as an open question.
For example:
What was today like?
How are you thinking about talking to them?
What happened with the plan?
What concerns you, if anything, about that?
After you write your open question, add one genuine affirmation.
Choose something specific and true. Do not flatter, exaggerate, or praise just to be encouraging. Simply name a real effort, strength, value, or choice you can honestly see.
For example:
You have been thinking about this carefully.
You kept showing up to it, even when it was frustrating.
You are trying to handle this in a way that does not make things worse.
You noticed something important instead of ignoring it.
When you are finished, read the open question and affirmation together.
Notice how different they feel from advice, pressure, or generic encouragement.
This practice is not about finding perfect MI wording. It is about learning two small habits: ask in a way that gives the other person room to think, and name something real that helps them see their own strength more clearly.
Comments