🧭 Module 16 — Exploring Values and Developing Discrepancy | MI Course
Updated: Oct 12
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Therapeutic Modalities Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio – Listen on the go - (coming soon)
🧭Module 16 — Exploring Values and Developing Discrepancy
The strongest reasons for change are never imported. They are already inside the person, filed under whatever matters most, such as loved ones or the kind of character they intend to have, and often under the answer they would give if asked what their life is actually for. Every tool in this course draws from that well eventually, and the present lesson goes to it directly. Values exploration is how a conversation finds a person's deepest cares, and discrepancy is what happens when that care gets placed beside current behavior. Handled well, the pairing produces some of the most powerful moments MI can generate. Handled badly, it produces shame, which is why the craft here matters as much as the tools.
What Values Do in MI
Values are the ground motivation stands on. Behavior change lasts when it serves something the person already loves, and it wobbles when it serves anything less, whether that is a nagging relative or a bare should.
Hear the difference in two reasons for the same change. Should reason: "I need to get in shape because my doctor keeps bringing up my weight and I'm tired of the conversation." Values reason: "I want to be the grandfather who's down on the floor building the train set, not the one watching from the chair." Both sentences point at the same treadmill. The first is borrowed pressure, and borrowed pressure has a short battery life; it works exactly as long as the doctor is in the room. The second is plugged into something with no off switch, because the man who said it will love that grandchild every single day the change gets hard.
This is why values exploration is not a warm digression from the real work of a change conversation. It is drilling for the fuel everything else will run on.
Exploring Values
The exploring is done with open questions aimed not at the problem but at what matters, and the questions are bigger and simpler than most helpers expect to be useful:
"What matters most to you, when everything else gets stripped away?"
"How do you hope your kids will remember you?"
"Who do you want to be through all of this?"
"When you're at your best, what does that look like?"
"If nothing at all needed fixing, what would you want your life to be about?"
Questions like these can feel almost too large to put to someone, and people answer them, often with visible relief, because almost no one in their life has ever asked. The person mid-struggle has fielded endless questions about drinking or debt; hearing what they love come up instead is a different kind of attention, and it changes the room.
For conversations where open questions stall, MI has a structured tool worth knowing: the values card sort. A deck of cards, each carrying a single value such as family or honesty, with dozens of others alongside, gets sorted by the person into three piles ranked from very important down to not important. Then the top pile gets whittled to five, and they talk about why those five. The tool works because sorting is easier than generating; someone who goes blank at "what are your values?" can work through a deck without hesitation, and the whittling forces the honest ranking that conversation alone rarely reaches. Paper versions exist freely, and the tool is worth improvising with index cards for anyone who likes it.
However the values surface, one follow-up makes them real rather than ceremonial: "How does that show up in an ordinary week?" A value that appears nowhere in an actual Tuesday is an aspiration, which is still useful information; a value visible in the week is ground solid enough to build on. And the question plants, gently, the seed of everything the next section teaches, because sometimes the honest answer is: it doesn't show up, and the person hears themselves say so.
What Discrepancy Is
Discrepancy is the felt gap between what a person deeply values and what they are currently doing. Not the gap as observed by others, which is usually visible from space, but the gap as felt by the person, which may never once have been consciously held in view.
Two honest teachings about discrepancy, and the first is that it is uncomfortable, and the discomfort is the motor. A person who feels no gap between their values and their behavior has no internal reason to change, however loudly the world objects. A person who feels the gap has acquired the most durable motivation there is: the ache of being out of alignment with oneself. MI does not manufacture that ache; it clears the fog so the person can see a divide that was already theirs. That distinction is the ethical spine of the whole lesson.
The second teaching is calibration. A gap too small moves nothing: "I value health and I had two cookies" generates a shrug, correctly. And a gap too vast crushes rather than motivates: someone shown a canyon between everything they love and everything they do does not lace up their boots; they conclude the crossing is impossible and stop looking. Discrepancy motivates in a middle band, where the distance is real enough to matter and bridgeable enough to face. When the divide is canyon-sized, the craft is to work a single edge of it, pairing one value with a single behavior, a stretch the person can imagine walking.
Developing Discrepancy Without Shame
Here is the crucial craft, and the line between this lesson's power and its misuse: the person names the gap, never the helper.
The helper-named gap has a familiar sound, and it is the sound of shame being manufactured: "You say your kids matter more than anything, but you're drunk by dinner every night." Every fact in that sentence may be true, and the sentence is an ambush. The person's love for their kids was just used as a weapon against them, and people defend against weapons; the conversation hits a wall while attack now clings to the value, which means the helper has spent the deepest fuel in the tank on a fire that burns the wrong thing.
The MI move is quieter: place the value and the behavior side by side, gently, in one sentence, and let the person do the math. "Your kids are the center of everything for you. And the evenings have been going to the drinking." Both halves are true and spoken with warmth, the join is a plain and, with nothing concluded on the person's behalf; the sentence shape is the double-sided reflection from Module 9, carrying the most important cargo it ever carries. Then silence, and the silence is part of the move. The person looks at the two truths sitting together, and whatever they say next is theirs: the gap, named by its owner, in words no one can argue with because no one else said them.
What makes it safe for the person to look at the gap at all is acceptance, the stance from Module 3: a person will examine the distance between their values and their behavior only in front of someone who plainly is not judging them for it. Acceptance is not the opposite of this work; it is the license for it.
And one calibrated care note belongs in the teaching itself: this work touches tender ground. Values sit next to grief and old wounds. A person who goes quiet in the heavy way, or a helper who feels the conversation tip from discomfort toward pain, should ease off; easing off is a signal being read correctly, not a failure of nerve. The gap will still be there on a gentler day, and for gaps tangled in serious pain, a qualified professional is the right companion for the walk.
A Value Meets a Habit
Maya's evenings have been eaten by her phone for two years. Not dramatically: after dinner and dishes she settles onto the couch and scrolls, ninety minutes or so, most nights, while her daughter Lina does homework across the room. Maya would call it unwinding. She has half-noticed it, the way one half-notices weather.
Her friend Priya, over coffee, is not talking about phones at all. She asks one of the big questions, because Maya has been feeling flat lately and can't say why: "What matters most to you these days, honestly?"
Maya doesn't hesitate: "Lina. These years, specifically. She's fourteen. I keep doing the math on how many ordinary evenings I have left before she's gone, and it's a small number. That's the whole thing for me right now."
Priya asks the follow-up: "How do those evenings actually go, an ordinary one?"
Maya starts to answer and slows down in the middle of the sentence, because she is watching the evening as she describes it: "We eat, we clean up, she does homework in the living room because she likes the company, and I'm... on the couch. On my phone. While the evenings I was just doing math about happen across the room."
Priya says almost nothing; a soft double-sided lands the two truths side by side: "The countdown is what matters most to you. And the evenings have been going to the phone." Then she lets it sit.
Maya is quiet for a moment, and what comes out of the silence is change talk, unforced and specific: "I don't want her memory of being fourteen to be the top of my head. God. I could just... not bring the phone to the couch. It's such a small thing. I want those evenings back while there are still evenings."
Nobody lectured Maya or named her gap, and there was no need to. Her own value and her own Tuesday were placed in the same sentence, in an atmosphere safe enough to look at both, and the math did what the math does. Want and ability surfaced in her voice, along with the first seed of a plan, and this course has established that hers is the only voice that counts.
Below this lesson, you'll find a Motivational Interviewing practice built around one of the skills you just learned, along with a few ways to begin noticing and practicing it in everyday life this week.
Motivational Interviewing Practice: One Value, One Tuesday
Discrepancy work is safest and most honest when you run it on yourself first, and it teaches the craft faster than any explanation.
This takes about ten minutes with paper and a pen.
One note before you start: choose a value-and-behavior pair that feels workable, not the most painful one you carry. If anything in this practice touches heavier ground than you expected, ease off; that's reading the signal correctly.
Write your top three values at the top of the page. If generating them is hard, sort instead: jot ten values that could plausibly be yours (family, health, honesty, growth, being useful, adventure, faith, friendship, creativity, peace) and cross out until three remain.
Circle the one that feels most alive right now, and write one sentence about why it made the cut.
Now describe an ordinary Tuesday, honestly, in five or six lines: where the hours actually go, morning to bed. No editorializing, just the log.
Place them side by side, in one written sentence, joined with "and," no conclusion attached: "___ matters most to me, and my Tuesdays mostly go to ___."
Sit with the sentence for one quiet minute and let yourself do the math. Then write whatever comes next in your own voice. If what comes is a want, a could, or a small specific idea, you just watched your own change talk surface, exactly the way Maya's did.
Fold the page and keep it. No plan required today; the seeing is the work.
This Week
Ask one person a big values question this week ("what matters most to you these days?") and just receive the answer, no follow-up agenda.
Notice one moment where your own behavior and a stated value sit in the same frame, and practice observing it with curiosity instead of a verdict.
If you hear someone use a loved one's own values against them in an argument, watch what it does to the conversation, and file the lesson.
Disclaimer:
Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses, lessons, skills, and practices are offered for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨
If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments