🥀 Module 15 — Living With What You Now Know | Deathbed Regrets Course
Updated: Oct 1
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Death and Dying Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio – listen on the go - (coming soon)
🥀Module 15 — Living With What You Now Know
This course began at the bedside, and everything it has taught was learned there: from the people Bronnie Ware tended, from the research that confirmed what she heard, from the hospice rooms where repair and completion get practiced daily. This final lesson makes the turn the dying themselves kept asking for. The patients who voiced the famous regrets did not offer them as confession; nearly all of them offered them as warning, as mail sent back across the border for the benefit of the people still living. The highest use of everything in this course belongs to those people, which is to say everyone reading, whether the time remaining is forty years or four weeks. What follows is the new work of this closing lesson: how to actually use the knowledge, as an instrument for decisions and as a compass for the regrets already in hand.
The Deathbed Test
There is a tool hiding in plain sight inside this entire course, and both regret researchers and hospice clinicians reach for it constantly: anticipated regret, the deliberate use of the imagined end to illuminate a present choice. In its common form it is called the deathbed test, and it asks one question of any real decision: from the end of my life, looking back, which of these choices will I regret?
The test sounds simple. Used carelessly, it is merely dramatic. Used properly, with everything this course has taught, it is one of the sharpest decision instruments a person can own, and it runs in five steps. Watch it run, start to finish, through one real decision.
Dominic, forty-seven, has been offered the promotion of his career. It requires relocating across the country, which means leaving during his two teenagers' last years at home; the alternative is declining it, probably permanently, and staying.
Name the choice as two roads, honestly. Not promotion versus no promotion, which hides the stakes, but the real cargo of each road: the career achieved at the cost of the last years of his children's childhoods, versus those years kept at the cost of the career's summit. The test cannot work on a dishonestly named choice.
Stand at the end and look back. Dominic projects forward, not five years, where ambition still shouts, but all the way, to the vantage this whole course has described, where the life review runs and the roles fall away. From there, he asks the question in the dying's own grammar: which of these two roads turns into a sentence beginning I wish I had?
Identify which road is the drift. Every choice has a bolder road and a road of momentum, and the action-and-inaction lesson of this course taught what becomes of each over decades. Dominic marks them: taking the leap is the action; in his particular case, oddly, the promotion is also the momentum road, the default his career has been rolling toward, while staying, declining, choosing the kitchen table over the corner office, is the choice that would take actual deciding.
Apply the correction. The test, run naively, has a known bias, taught in full in the next section, and the reading must be adjusted for it before it is trusted.
Read the answer as information, not command. The test does not issue orders; it reveals which road his deepest values are already on, with a clarity present-tense life rarely allows. Dominic still weighs duties, money, his wife's career. But he now weighs them knowing what the end-of-life vantage showed him: when he stood there honestly, the sentence that formed was not I wish I had taken the promotion. It was the other one, and it was about evenings, and he recognized it instantly, because this course's lesson on the second famous regret is full of men saying exactly that sentence, too late to use it. Dominic is using it on time.
The Test's Hidden Bias
Now the correction, and it must be taught honestly, because an instrument with an unmarked bias is worse than no instrument at all.
When people run the deathbed test naively, imagining future regret from inside their present fears, the test tends to favor staying put, and the research on regret explains exactly why. Imagined regret over a bold move is vivid: the mind effortlessly screens the failure, the embarrassment, the money lost, the move that didn't work out, in full color, because actions produce concrete, picturable outcomes. Imagined regret over the slow drift produces no image at all. There is no scene in which nothing happened; the unstarted business, the unmoved city, the unmade call have no footage for the mind to screen. So the naive test compares a vivid imagined pain against an invisible one and concludes, reasonably and wrongly, that the bold road is the dangerous one.
Every lesson of this course testifies to which way the error actually runs. The temporal pattern from the action-and-inaction lesson found it in the data: actions are over-regretted in the short term, and it is the inactions, the unfilmable nothings, that dominate the regrets of a whole life. The famous five themselves are the bias's victims, five categories of drift that never produced a single vivid warning image until the end. So the correction is this: whenever the deathbed test seems to be advising safety, run the second question before trusting it. Not which choice could go visibly wrong, but which choice could become a quiet I wish I had in thirty years? Dominic ran it. The promotion declined could go visibly wrong in ways he could picture all afternoon. The years at home skipped could not be pictured at all, and that, he now knew, was precisely the signature of the regrets that last.
Regret as a Compass, Not a Verdict
The test serves decisions still ahead. But most people finished this course holding regrets already formed, at twenty-six or fifty-three or eighty-eight, and the final piece of new work is what to do with those, starting now, and it begins by changing what a regret is for.
A regret read as a verdict points backward: case closed, damage assessed, sentence pronounced. Everything this course has taught argues for the other reading. The values mechanism from the anatomy lesson established that a regret can only form around something loved, which means every regret currently aching in any reader's chest is a live report on a value still held. And a live value is steerable-by. So the compass move, usable at any age, runs in three short steps: when a regret surfaces, first name the value underneath it, not the failure, the value. Then ask which of this course's two standing tracks is open for it, the repair of the world taught in its own lesson, or the completion that needs only one person, taught in its own. Then act at whatever size the present allows.
In practice it looks almost suspiciously simple. The pang about the lost friend is, per the drift lesson, a value called that friendship still matters, and the track is open: the call gets made this week, thirty years early instead of thirty years late. The recurring ache about words never said to a living parent is the silence regret announcing itself with the stakes not yet inverted, and the repair lesson's four sentences work at any age; they do not require a deathbed, only the willingness the deathbed eventually supplies for free. And the regrets whose doors have already closed, the person gone, the years unrecoverable, do not wait for a diagnosis either: the unsendable letter, the witness, the proper grieving taught in the completion lesson are available this afternoon, to the healthy, and work the same way. The dying have no monopoly on completion. They are simply the only ones reliably forced into it, and the entire forward turn of this course is the discovery that nothing about the work requires the forcing.
The Long Game
One last honesty, so the course ends where it has stood throughout, between false comfort and false despair. A life steered by everything taught here, the test run on its real decisions, the compass read on its regrets, the tracks walked while walking is easy, does not arrive at the end regret-free. No life does. Choices exclude; every road taken closes others; some losses will be grieved at the end no matter how well the middle was lived. Anyone promised a regret-free deathbed is being sold something, and this course does not sell it.
What it offers instead is what the bedsides actually show is possible, and it is better than the impossible thing. A life steered this way arrives at the end with regrets, yes, but with regrets of a different condition: told, instead of carried in secret for fifty years. Tended, their values acted on at some real size, instead of deferred to a later that never came. Grieved along the way, instead of arriving at the review as a lifetime of unopened mail. Regrets, in short, small enough to carry, and a person can die holding those the way one holds anything fully known and fully mourned: without being crushed.
And for the final word, the course returns to the woman it began with, because she earned it. Bronnie Ware sat with more deathbed regret than almost anyone who has ever written about it. Her patients carried everything this course has named, the unlived selves, the lost evenings, the swallowed words, the vanished friends, the gray years, and some of them carried far heavier things besides. And her testimony, offered after all of it, was not that regret won. It was that every single one of her patients, by some road, in their own time, found peace before the end. This course has spent fifteen lessons mapping those roads. They are open now, today, at every age, to anyone willing to walk them, and the dying who sent back their regrets sent them for exactly that purpose: not as a list of what goes wrong with a life, but as directions, from the people who could finally see the whole road, to the people with road still ahead.
Disclaimer: Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses, lessons, skills, and practices are offered for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨 If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments