🚪 Module 11 — Alkaline Hydrolysis (Water Cremation) | Death Options Course
Updated: Sep 30
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Death and Dying Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio - listen and learn (coming soon)
Module 11 — Alkaline Hydrolysis (Water Cremation)
This lesson opens the water-based cluster with the gentlest sibling flame cremation ever had: alkaline hydrolysis, the dissolving of the body back to its building blocks in warm water rather than fire. It is one of the most misunderstood options in this entire course, saddled with a nickname that makes people flinch and a process almost nobody has had explained to them honestly. By the end of this lesson, the chemistry will be plain, the one uncomfortable question will be answered straight, and a quiet detail about who chose this method in 2021 will likely make the whole option feel suddenly real.
What It Is
Alkaline hydrolysis is the reduction of a body to bone and a sterile liquid using water, alkali, heat, and gentle pressure, accomplishing in hours what soil burial accomplishes over decades. It travels under a confusing pile of names, so they are worth defining all at once: alkaline hydrolysis is the technical term; aquamation and water cremation are the common consumer names; resomation is a trademarked name from one of the equipment makers; and flameless cremation, green cremation, and biocremation show up in marketing too. They all describe the identical process. Most paperwork will say alkaline hydrolysis or water cremation, so those are the two to recognize.
Here is the cleanest way to understand what it actually does. When a body is buried in soil, it eventually returns to its basic components through natural chemical breakdown, a process that takes years. Alkaline hydrolysis is that same essential chemistry, the breaking of the body's tissues back into their simplest parts, simply run deliberately, gently, and fast, in warm alkaline water instead of slowly in the ground. It is not burning and it is not rotting; it is dissolution, the body unmade into the sterile, simple molecules it was originally built from. The word cremation appears in its nicknames only because the end result mirrors flame cremation's: the family receives bone, processed to ash. Everything in between is entirely different.
The Process from Beginning to End
The vessel. The body, unembalmed and usually wrapped in a biodegradable shroud of silk or wool, is placed in a stainless steel vessel built for exactly this, a sealed, pressure-rated chamber roughly the size of a large industrial oven. Embalming is not needed, and certain embalming chemicals are actually counterproductive to the process, so it is generally skipped.
The solution. The chamber is filled with a mixture that is about 95 percent water and 5 percent strong alkali, typically potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide, the same family of alkalis used in soap-making and food processing. This is the working fluid that will do what soil microbes do, only far faster.
Heat and gentle pressure. The vessel heats the solution and holds it under modest pressure, which keeps the water from boiling and lets it work at an effective temperature. Systems vary: some run hotter and faster, others cooler and slower over a longer span, but all keep the body fully submerged and circulating in the warm alkaline bath throughout.
Four to sixteen hours. Over this span, the alkali and warm water break down the body's soft tissues completely, reducing everything but the bone to molecules dissolved in the water. The wide time range simply reflects the different systems; a hotter, higher-pressure unit finishes in several hours, a gentler low-temperature one takes most of a day.
What remains. Two things, and only two. First, a sterile liquid, the body's soft tissue reduced to a solution of water, salts, sugars, amino acids, and small peptides, the simple, benign components all tissue is built from, with no DNA and nothing living left in it. This liquid is called hydrolysate, and it has its own section below because it raises the one question everyone asks. Second, the bones, which remain behind in the vessel, softened and bright white, far more brittle and pale than what flame leaves. After the liquid is drained, those bones are dried and processed to a fine powder, exactly as the Flame Cremation lesson described for flame-cremated bone, and this powder is what comes home to the family.
The Down-the-Drain Question
Every honest teacher of this option has to answer one question directly, because every newcomer thinks it even if they are too polite to ask: what happens to the liquid? And the blunt version of the worry underneath it is, does the body get poured down the drain?
Here is the straight answer, taught plainly because dodging it would be worse than asking it. The hydrolysate, that sterile solution of salts, sugars, and amino acids, is released into the wastewater system, the same way other regulated liquids from death care are. Said baldly, that can land hard. So here is the context that makes it honest rather than shocking. The liquid is completely sterile; the high-alkaline process destroys all pathogens and DNA, leaving nothing biologically alive, which is more than can be said of most of what enters a sewer. Chemically, the solution is benign, close kin to the byproducts of soap-making, and it is pH-balanced before release so it enters the system neutralized. And the part most people have never considered: conventional embalming has always sent the body's own blood and fluids into those very same wastewater systems, as a routine step in preparing a body for a traditional funeral. The practice that feels most normal and the practice that feels most startling have, on this specific point, been doing a version of the same thing all along; one has simply never been described out loud.
Some providers offer a gentler-sounding alternative, returning the hydrolysate to the land as a nutrient-rich soil amendment where regulations permit, since the solution is, in plant terms, fertilizer. But the wastewater route is the common one, and a reader weighing this option deserves to know it cleanly.
And then this, because it matters as much as the chemistry: the feeling is still allowed to be a feeling. Knowing that the liquid is sterile and benign, and that embalming did something comparable, may settle the question completely for one person and not at all for another, and the person who hears all of it and still feels something tighten is not being irrational or squeamish. The discomfort is a real response to a real and intimate fact, and it is honored here, not argued away. The teaching's only job is to make sure the flinch, if it comes, is to the true picture rather than to a nickname, and that the reader's response to the actual facts is genuinely theirs to have.
What the Family Receives
What comes home is, in the family's hands, very much like flame-cremation ashes with two differences worth knowing.
First, there is more of it. Because the gentle process leaves the bone more fully intact rather than partly consumed by fire, alkaline hydrolysis returns roughly 20 to 30 percent more ash than flame cremation does, a noticeably fuller urn. Families sometimes find this unexpectedly meaningful, more of the person returned.
Second, the ash is whiter and finer, paler and softer in texture than the gray of flame cremation, because it was never burned.
Beyond those two differences, everything the Flame Cremation lesson taught about what to do with ashes applies in full. These remains can be scattered, kept, buried in a biodegradable urn, grown into a memorial tree, cast into a reef, made into glass or a diamond, sent on a rocket, divided among family and places, every single layer-two door in this course, each taught in its own lesson, opens from alkaline hydrolysis exactly as it opens from flame cremation. The path to the body's reduction was gentler; the choices that follow are identical and complete.
Where It Came From
The process is older than its current fame suggests. Alkaline hydrolysis was first developed in the late 1800s and used through the twentieth century mainly to dispose of animal remains and, later, in research and medical settings. Its move into human death care began in the institutions that handle bodies with the most care: medical schools. The Mayo Clinic adopted alkaline hydrolysis for the donors in its anatomical bequest program, a quiet vote of confidence from one of the most respected names in medicine. Minnesota became the first U.S. state to legalize it for general funeral use, in 2003, and from there it spread state by state into the funeral profession over the following two decades.
But the detail that makes this option suddenly real for many people is a single name. In 2021, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the South African cleric and anti-apartheid icon, died, and he had chosen aquamation for his own body, specifically and publicly, as a final environmental statement, the gentlest and least wasteful exit he could make. For a great many people around the world, that was the first they had ever heard of water cremation, and the fact that a figure of Tutu's moral stature had chosen it deliberately, as the ethical option, reframed it instantly from a strange-sounding novelty into a considered, principled choice. When people hesitate at the nickname, the Tutu detail is often what lets them look again.
The Benefits
A fraction of the footprint. This is the central case for the option, the reason Tutu and so many others choose it. Alkaline hydrolysis uses a small fraction of the energy of flame cremation and produces no direct combustion emissions, no greenhouse gases sent up a stack, and none of the trace pollutants flame can release. For someone weighing ecology heavily who still wants the convenience and flexibility of cremated remains, it is, by most measures, the gentlest version of cremation available.
Gentleness itself. Many families are drawn to the quality the process shares with its description: no fire, no flame, a quiet warm-water dissolution that feels, to those who choose it, tender in a way combustion does not. The language families use, the body being gently returned rather than burned, is part of the appeal.
More of the person returned, in the fuller, whiter ash, with every memorial option that flame cremation opens fully available.
All of cremation's flexibility, the time to decide, the portability, the divisibility, taught in the Flame Cremation lesson and true here in full.
The Considerations
Availability. Alkaline hydrolysis is legal for human use in a growing number of U.S. states and parts of Canada, with more added most years, so checking what your own state allows is the first practical step. And as with human composting, legality and availability are two different things: a state may permit it without yet having a provider, and even where it is legal, equipped facilities can be sparse. Bodies can be transported to a provider in another state, and funeral homes arrange this routinely, so the nearest provider may be a region away rather than around the corner. The honest summary is that this option is spreading steadily but is not yet everywhere, and a phone call or two confirms what is genuinely available near you.
The down-the-drain question, taught above, is the one most likely to give a family member pause, and it is best raised and answered openly in advance rather than discovered with discomfort later.
Religious positions, taught honestly. The traditions vary. The Catholic Church has expressed reservations, with the U.S. bishops stating that alkaline hydrolysis does not, in their judgment, sufficiently respect the body, the same concern they raised about human composting. Traditions that call for burial of the intact body, including Islam and traditional Judaism, are committed elsewhere. Many Protestant and other clergy have accepted or embraced it, and a figure like Tutu, an Anglican archbishop, chose it himself, which tells you the question is genuinely live rather than settled. As everywhere in this course, a family's own faith leader is the right last word, and the conversation is best had before the need arises.
The newness and the nickname. Some family members will need the process explained before "water cremation" stops sounding alarming, and the natural-decomposition framing from this lesson, the same chemistry as soil burial, gently and quickly, in water, tends to be the sentence that settles it. Giving your family that framing in advance is part of choosing this well.
Who Tends to Choose It
A Solomon, who spent his career as an environmental engineer measuring exactly what industrial processes release into the air, chose aquamation the moment he understood the energy difference, and told his sons it was the only version of cremation his own conscience could sign off on. A Lorraine, who simply could not bear the thought of flame for someone she loved and felt a quiet relief she couldn't quite name when she learned there was a way that used only warm water, found that the gentleness was reason enough; not every choice in this course is made on a spreadsheet. And a Priya, planning ahead the way this course encourages, liked that water cremation returned more of her to her daughter and opened every memorial door she had been considering, the scattering and the niche and the small piece of glass, with a smaller footprint than flame, so she chose it as the gentle front end to all the choices that would follow.
What draws them is a particular pairing this option offers and few others do: the full flexibility of cremated remains, with a fraction of the harm and a gentleness that, for many, simply feels right. The fire was never the only way to arrive at ashes. This is the other one, quieter, lighter, and increasingly within reach.
Disclaimer: Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses, lessons, skills, and practices are offered for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨 If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments