🚪 Module 18 — Cryonics and Long-Term Preservation | Death Options Course
Updated: Sep 30
Free Course by Everything IFS Academy | Death and Dying Series
Help us reach the people who may need this most by sharing this free course with friends, family, colleagues, online communities, social media or on your own website.
🎧 Audio - listen and learn (coming soon)
Module 18 — Cryonics and Long-Term Preservation
This lesson opens the most futuristic door in this course, and the one that asks the most careful handling: cryonics, the preservation of the legally dead at extreme cold in the hope that medicine not yet invented might one day revive them. It is the option where science, hope, and grief are hardest to hold at once, so this lesson will hold all three honestly, claiming nothing that cannot be claimed and dismissing nothing that does not deserve dismissal. By the end, the procedure will be plain from the deathbed to the steel tank, the reasoning of the people who choose it will be clear, and the genuine uncertainties will stand exactly where they are, neither hidden nor inflated.
A note on how this lesson is written, because it matters. Cryonics sits at the edge of what anyone can verify, and the honest posture is to lay both truths side by side and let the reader weigh them. What follows describes what its practitioners believe and do, and what mainstream science says in return, without quietly tilting the floor in either direction.
What It Is and What It Claims
Cryonics is the practice of preserving a legally dead person's body, or brain, at the temperature of liquid nitrogen, on the hypothesis that future medicine may be able to revive and repair them, curing whatever caused the death and reversing any injury from the preservation itself. The preserved person is held in a state its practitioners are careful not to call dead in the final sense: they regard legal death as a process rather than an instant, and cryopreservation as an attempt to pause that process before it becomes irreversible by any future means.
Here are the two truths this lesson refuses to rush past, set plainly beside each other.
The members' view: cryonics is a rational bet under uncertainty. Their argument runs that a person who is buried or cremated has a precisely zero percent chance of any future, while a person preserved has some chance, unknown but greater than zero, and that when the alternative is certain and permanent oblivion, even a small chance is worth taking. They are not, by and large, claiming it will work. They are claiming it might, and that might is categorically different from the guaranteed nothing of the other doors. To them it is less a belief than a wager made in the only direction that leaves a door open.
The scientific reality: no human being has ever been revived from cryopreservation, and neither has any whole mammal. The technology to reverse the process and repair the original cause of death does not exist, is not on any near horizon, and may never exist. Reanimating a complex preserved organism remains, as of now, entirely hypothetical, and many scientists regard the obstacles as possibly insurmountable rather than merely unsolved. Cryonics rests on a chain of future breakthroughs, none of which has been demonstrated.
Both of those are true at the same time, and an honest account of this option is exactly the tension between them, left intact.
The Process from Beginning to End
Legal death must come first. This is the foundational fact, and it is non-negotiable: cryonics is never performed on a living person. It begins only after a physician has pronounced legal death, and to do otherwise would be homicide. What members are betting on is that legal death, the heart stopping, declared under today's criteria, is not yet true death at the cellular and structural level, and that preservation begun quickly enough captures a person who is, in their framing, not yet beyond reach. Everything in the procedure is a race against the clock that starts at pronouncement.
Standby and stabilization. Because that clock is merciless, members arrange for a standby team to be positioned near the deathbed when death is anticipated, ready to begin within minutes of pronouncement. The moment death is declared, the team works to keep the body's systems from degrading: restoring circulation and oxygenation artificially with mechanical chest compression and a ventilator, packing the body in ice, and administering protective medications, all to buy time and limit the damage that sets in the instant blood stops flowing.
Cooling and the replacement of blood. The body is cooled steadily, and in the central surgical step, the blood is washed out and replaced with a cryoprotectant solution, a kind of medical antifreeze, circulated through the vascular system to reach the tissues throughout.
Vitrification, and why ice is the enemy. Here is the scientific heart of the procedure, and the reason for the cryoprotectant. The great destroyer in any freezing of living tissue is ice. When water inside cells freezes, it forms crystals, and those crystals are jagged; they rupture cell walls and shred fine structure, which in the brain would be catastrophic. Cryonics' answer is vitrification: the cryoprotectant so thoroughly replaces and binds the body's water that, as the temperature drops, the tissue does not freeze into crystals at all but instead becomes a glass, a solid with no crystalline structure, like a hard candy rather than an ice cube. Vitrification is genuine, demonstrated science, used routinely to preserve embryos and some organs; its unproven leap is whether a vitrified whole body or brain can ever be warmed back without fatal damage. The technique is real. The reversal is the hope.
The long cool and the dewar. Over hours, the vitrified body is cooled the rest of the way to roughly minus 320 degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature of liquid nitrogen, at which all chemical activity, all decay, effectively stops. The person is then placed in a dewar, a giant vacuum-insulated steel flask, essentially an industrial thermos, filled with liquid nitrogen, where preservation can in principle continue indefinitely so long as the nitrogen is replenished. The dewars require no electricity, only regular topping-up of nitrogen, which is part of how the organizations argue the preservation can outlast power grids and bad years.
Why stored head-down. A small, sober detail that tells the whole philosophy: whole bodies are stored upside down in the dewar. The reason is risk management. If a dewar ever lost nitrogen and could not be refilled in time, the liquid would boil off from the top down, and storing the body head-down means the brain, submerged at the bottom, is the very last thing to be exposed. Everything in cryonics, in the end, is organized around protecting the brain, which leads directly to the next choice.
Whole Body or Neuro
Members choose between two forms of preservation, and the second unsettles people until they hear the reasoning, so it is taught plainly rather than flinched past.
Whole-body preservation keeps the entire body. Neuropreservation keeps only the head, or in some framings the brain, preserved alone.
The logic behind neuropreservation, in the members' own terms, is this: everything that makes a person, the memories, the personality, the self, is encoded in the structure of the brain, and the body is, from this point of view, a replaceable life-support apparatus. They reason that any future medicine advanced enough to revive and repair a vitrified brain at all, would, by definition, be advanced enough to provide that brain a new body, whether grown, regenerated, or otherwise, so preserving the original body is preserving the easy part at great cost while the hard and only essential part is the brain. Neuropreservation is cheaper, allows faster and more thorough vitrification of the one organ that matters, and concentrates every protective resource on it. To an outsider it can sound macabre; to a member it is simply following the logic to its end. The reader is not asked to share the reasoning, only to understand that it is reasoning, held by sober people, and not a whim.
The Organizations and the Long Game
Cryonics is carried out by a small number of long-standing nonprofit member organizations, the oldest founded in the early 1970s, which perform the procedure and maintain the dewars, some holding well over a hundred patients, with hundreds or thousands more members signed up against the day. Membership is arranged in advance through paperwork and, crucially, through funding: the standard mechanism is a life insurance policy with the organization named as beneficiary, which is how members of ordinary means arrange it without large sums on hand. In keeping with this course's standing rule, the figures are left out, since they change; the mechanism, life insurance, is the durable fact worth knowing.
And then the genuinely hard question, the one the organizations themselves take most seriously: institutional survival across deep time. A preserved person may need to be maintained not for years but for centuries before any revival technology could conceivably exist, and that requires an organization to outlast economic collapses, wars, leadership deaths, legal upheavals, and simple organizational decay, topping up nitrogen the entire time, for longer than most nations have existed. The organizations address this with patient-care trust funds designed to fund maintenance in perpetuity from invested principal, and with cultures built deliberately around continuity. Whether any human institution can actually hold a promise that long is unknown, unknowable in advance, and honestly acknowledged by thoughtful members as the bet inside the bet. History is not gentle to organizations over centuries, and everyone serious about cryonics knows it.
The Benefits
Stated, as this lesson has promised, in the terms the people who choose it would use.
A door left open. This is the whole of it, and to members it is everything: every other option in this course closes the future permanently, and this one, whatever its odds, does not. For a person who experiences certain oblivion as the thing most worth resisting, a non-zero chance is not a small comfort but the only comfort on the menu.
Hope with a procedure attached. Cryonics is not a wish; it is a wish with a standby team, a surgical protocol, and a maintained tank. For people who find meaning in having done something concrete against death rather than merely accepting it, the existence of the procedure is itself the benefit.
An intellectually coherent bet, for those who hold it. Many members are scientists, engineers, and technologists who have looked hard at the wager and find it rational on its own terms, and there is a real if hard-to-measure comfort in facing death with a position one has reasoned through rather than inherited.
The Considerations
These are substantial, and a clear-eyed account names them fully.
It may simply not work, and probably faces obstacles we cannot yet measure. Mainstream science's skepticism is deep and is not mere closed-mindedness; the reversal cryonics depends on has never been shown in any whole mammal, and may never be. A family considering this should hold no illusion that it is buying revival. It is buying a chance whose size is unknown and whose existence some serious scientists doubt entirely.
Family conflict is common and painful. Cryonics frequently divides families, sometimes bitterly, particularly when one member chooses it and others find it disturbing, false, or a refusal to accept death. There have been real and wrenching disputes, and a person choosing cryonics does their family a profound kindness by documenting their wishes ironclad and, far better, discussing them openly long beforehand, so the standby team is not arriving into a family at war.
The goodbye stays unresolved. Every other door in this course offers the bereaved a clear ending: a grave, an urn, ashes on the wind. Cryonics offers an ellipsis instead of a period. The person is neither buried nor gone nor here, but suspended, and grief built around a permanent maybe is its own difficult country, with no map and no closure of the usual kind. Families deserve to know in advance that they are signing up for a loss without the customary shape of one.
The deep-time gamble, taught above, sits under everything: the bet depends on an institution keeping a promise longer than empires have lasted.
Who Tends to Choose It
The people who walk through this door deserve, as everyone in this course does, to be drawn with full dignity, because they are not foolish and they are not in denial; they have, if anything, looked at death more directly than most and refused the usual flinch.
A Gregory, a retired software engineer who spent his career watching the impossible become routine, did the arithmetic the way he did everything, decided that a small chance beat a guaranteed zero, arranged a life insurance policy to fund it, and discusses the whole plan with the unbothered clarity of a man who has made peace not with dying but with trying. A Suen-Li, a research biologist, chose neuropreservation specifically because she understood the science well enough to find the brain-is-the-person logic persuasive, and she keeps her membership card next to her organ donor card without feeling the slightest contradiction. And a Marguerite, eighty-one, signed up less from technological conviction than from a plain, stubborn curiosity she has carried her whole life; she does not expect to wake, exactly, but as she puts it, she would hate to miss it if she did, and she likes that her last decision was made facing forward.
What they share is not certainty. It is a refusal to treat the door as already closed. For the people built that way, cryonics is not a denial of death but a wager against its finality, taken with open eyes, full knowledge of the odds, and a particular kind of courage the rest of the menu does not ask for.
Disclaimer: Everything IFS Academy is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the IFS Institute. While we strive for accuracy, errors can occur, and users are encouraged to cross-reference critical information. These courses, lessons, skills, and practices are offered for educational and self-reflection purposes only. They do not constitute therapy, mental health treatment, clinical training, or crisis support, and they should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care.
Crisis Support: 🚨 If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, feel unsafe, feel at risk of harming yourself or someone else, or feel too overwhelmed to safely use self-directed practices, please pause this material and reach out for immediate support. Contact a licensed mental health professional, call or text 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or use your local emergency or crisis resources.
Comments